Real Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps | Simulation Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Questions

TestkingPDF web-based practice exam is compatible with all browsers and operating systems. Whereas the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate PDF file is concerned this file is the collection of real, valid, and updated Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions. You can use the Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Pdf Format on your desktop computer, laptop, tabs, or even on your smartphone and start Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) exam questions preparation anytime and anywhere.

According to the candidate's demand, TestkingPDF will update Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate dumps. TestkingPDF is a composite of top IT experts, certified trainers and competent authors for Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam. They collate the braindumps, guarantee the quality! No matter how the times change, TestkingPDF good quality will never change. After the majority of candidates purchase our products, they passed Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Certification Exam, which indicates TestkingPDF has high quality.

>> Real Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps <<

Best Preparation Material For The Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps from TestkingPDF

Our society needs all kinds of comprehensive talents, the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate latest preparation materials can give you what you want, but not just some boring book knowledge, but flexible use of combination with the social practice. Therefore, it is necessary for us to pass the qualification Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate examinations, the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study practice question can bring you high quality learning platform. If you want to progress and achieve their ideal life, if you still use the traditional methods by exam, so would you please choose the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate test materials, it will surely make you shine at the moment.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Assembling and Deploying Applications: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers get knowledge about coding a chain using a pyfunc mode, coding a simple chain using langchain, and coding a simple chain according to requirements. Additionally, the topic focuses on basic elements needed to create a RAG application. Lastly, the topic addresses sub-topics about registering the model to Unity Catalog using MLflow.
Topic 2	Data Preparation: Generative AI Engineers covers a chunking strategy for a given document structure and model constraints. The topic also focuses on filter extraneous content in source documents. Lastly, Generative AI Engineers also learn about extracting document content from provided source data and format.
Topic 3	Evaluation and Monitoring: This topic is all about selecting an LLM choice and key metrics. Moreover, Generative AI Engineers learn about evaluating model performance. Lastly, the topic includes sub-topics about inference logging and usage of Databricks features.
Topic 4	Application Development: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers learn about tools needed to extract data, Langchain similar tools, and assessing responses to identify common issues. Moreover, the topic includes questions about adjusting an LLM's response, LLM guardrails, and the best LLM based on the attributes of the application.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q19-Q24):

NEW QUESTION # 19
A Generative Al Engineer has already trained an LLM on Databricks and it is now ready to be deployed.
Which of the following steps correctly outlines the easiest process for deploying a model on Databricks?

A. Save the model along with its dependencies in a local directory, build the Docker image, and run the Docker container
B. Log the model using MLflow during training, directly register the model to Unity Catalog using the MLflow API, and start a serving endpoint
C. Log the model as a pickle object, upload the object to Unity Catalog Volume, register it to Unity Catalog using MLflow, and start a serving endpoint
D. Wrap the LLM's prediction function into a Flask application and serve using Gunicorn

Answer: B

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The goal is to deploy a trained LLM on Databricks in the simplest and most integrated manner.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: This method involves unnecessary steps like logging the model as a pickle object, which is not the most efficient path in a Databricks environment.
* Option B: Logging the model with MLflow during training and then using MLflow's API to register and start serving the model is straightforward and leverages Databricks' built-in functionalities for seamless model deployment.
* Option C: Building and running a Docker container is a complex and less integrated approach within the Databricks ecosystem.
* Option D: Using Flask and Gunicorn is a more manual approach and less integrated compared to the native capabilities of Databricks and MLflow.
OptionBprovides the most straightforward and efficient process, utilizing Databricks' ecosystem to its full advantage for deploying models.

NEW QUESTION # 20
After changing the response generating LLM in a RAG pipeline from GPT-4 to a model with a shorter context length that the company self-hosts, the Generative AI Engineer is getting the following error:

What TWO solutions should the Generative AI Engineer implement without changing the response generating model? (Choose two.)

A. Use a smaller embedding model to generate
B. Reduce the maximum output tokens of the new model
C. Reduce the number of records retrieved from the vector database
D. Retrain the response generating model using ALiBi
E. Decrease the chunk size of embedded documents

Answer: C,E

Explanation:
* Problem Context: After switching to a model with a shorter context length, the error message indicating that the prompt token count has exceeded the limit suggests that the input to the model is too large.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Use a smaller embedding model to generate- This wouldn't necessarily address the issue of prompt size exceeding the model's token limit.
* Option B: Reduce the maximum output tokens of the new model- This option affects the output length, not the size of the input being too large.
* Option C: Decrease the chunk size of embedded documents- This would help reduce the size of each document chunk fed into the model, ensuring that the input remains within the model's context length limitations.
* Option D: Reduce the number of records retrieved from the vector database- By retrieving fewer records, the total input size to the model can be managed more effectively, keeping it within the allowable token limits.
* Option E: Retrain the response generating model using ALiBi- Retraining the model is contrary to the stipulation not to change the response generating model.
OptionsCandDare the most effective solutions to manage the model's shorter context length without changing the model itself, by adjusting the input size both in terms of individual document size and total documents retrieved.

NEW QUESTION # 21
A Generative Al Engineer would like an LLM to generate formatted JSON from emails. This will require parsing and extracting the following information: order ID, date, and sender email. Here's a sample email:

They will need to write a prompt that will extract the relevant information in JSON format with the highest level of output accuracy.
Which prompt will do that?

A. You will receive customer emails and need to extract date, sender email, and order ID. Return the extracted information in JSON format.
Here's an example: {"date": "April 16, 2024", "sender_email": "sarah.lee925@gmail.com", "order_id":
"RE987D"}
B. You will receive customer emails and need to extract date, sender email, and order ID. You should return the date, sender email, and order ID information in JSON format.
C. You will receive customer emails and need to extract date, sender email, and order ID. Return the extracted information in JSON format.
D. You will receive customer emails and need to extract date, sender email, and order ID. Return the extracted information in a human-readable format.

Answer: A

Explanation:
Problem Context: The goal is to parse emails to extract certain pieces of information and output this in a structured JSON format. Clarity and specificity in the prompt design will ensure higher accuracy in the LLM' s responses.
Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Provides a general guideline but lacks an example, which helps an LLM understand the exact format expected.
* Option B: Includes a clear instruction and a specific example of the output format. Providing an example is crucial as it helps set the pattern and format in which the information should be structured, leading to more accurate results.
* Option C: Does not specify that the output should be in JSON format, thus not meeting the requirement.
* Option D: While it correctly asks for JSON format, it lacks an example that would guide the LLM on how to structure the JSON correctly.
Therefore,Option Bis optimal as it not only specifies the required format but also illustrates it with an example, enhancing the likelihood of accurate extraction and formatting by the LLM.

NEW QUESTION # 22
A Generative AI Engineer has created a RAG application which can help employees retrieve answers from an internal knowledge base, such as Confluence pages or Google Drive. The prototype application is now working with some positive feedback from internal company testers. Now the Generative Al Engineer wants to formally evaluate the system's performance and understand where to focus their efforts to further improve the system.
How should the Generative AI Engineer evaluate the system?

A. Use an LLM-as-a-judge to evaluate the quality of the final answers generated.
B. Benchmark multiple LLMs with the same data and pick the best LLM for the job.
C. Curate a dataset that can test the retrieval and generation components of the system separately. Use MLflow's built in evaluation metrics to perform the evaluation on the retrieval and generation components.
D. Use cosine similarity score to comprehensively evaluate the quality of the final generated answers.

Answer: C

Explanation:
* Problem Context: After receiving positive feedback for the RAG application prototype, the next step is to formally evaluate the system to pinpoint areas for improvement.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: While cosine similarity scores are useful, they primarily measure similarity rather than the overall performance of an RAG system.
* Option B: This option provides a systematic approach to evaluation by testing both retrieval and generation components separately. This allows for targeted improvements and a clear understanding of each component's performance, using MLflow's metrics for a structured and standardized assessment.
* Option C: Benchmarking multiple LLMs does not focus on evaluating the existing system's components but rather on comparing different models.
* Option D: Using an LLM as a judge is subjective and less reliable for systematic performance evaluation.
OptionBis the most comprehensive and structured approach, facilitating precise evaluations and improvements on specific components of the RAG system.

NEW QUESTION # 23
A Generative Al Engineer would like an LLM to generate formatted JSON from emails. This will require parsing and extracting the following information: order ID, date, and sender email. Here's a sample email:

They will need to write a prompt that will extract the relevant information in JSON format with the highest level of output accuracy.
Which prompt will do that?

A. You will receive customer emails and need to extract date, sender email, and order ID. Return the extracted information in JSON format.
Here's an example: {"date": "April 16, 2024", "sender_email": "sarah.lee925@gmail.com", "order_id":
"RE987D"}
B. You will receive customer emails and need to extract date, sender email, and order ID. You should return the date, sender email, and order ID information in JSON format.
C. You will receive customer emails and need to extract date, sender email, and order ID. Return the extracted information in JSON format.
D. You will receive customer emails and need to extract date, sender email, and order ID. Return the extracted information in a human-readable format.

Answer: A

NEW QUESTION # 24
......

As is known to us, getting the newest information is very important for all people to pass the exam and get the certification in the shortest time. In order to help all customers gain the newest information about the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam, the experts and professors from our company designed the best Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Study Materials. The IT experts will update the system every day. If there is new information about the exam, you will receive an email about the newest information about the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study materials.

Simulation Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Questions: https://www.testkingpdf.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-testking-pdf-torrent.html

Ray Cook Ray Cook

Biography

Real Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps | Simulation Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Questions

Best Preparation Material For The Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps from TestkingPDF

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q19-Q24):

Quick Links

Resources

Support